RNC chairman Michael Steele under fire from Republican Senators

Enlaces patrocinados

Esta es la parte 10 de un total de 10 partes en la serie A Liberal Examiner in Los Angeles

***

Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele is again under fire from party leadership.

In late 2009, Steele inspired some ire among the Republican establishment for his extracurricular earnings and general spending policies.

On Thursday, while speaking at a fundraiser, he characterized the War in Afghanistan as on of Obama’s choosing and one that, based on historical precedent, is destined to fail.

This drew sharp criticism and calls to all but resign from Republican Senators McCain, Graham, and DeMint.

Republican Libertarian Senator Ron Paul, however, supported Steele’s claim, calling Afghanistan “Obama’s war”.

That much may actually be accurate. Obama did not start this war but, for better or for worse, he has made it his through decisive action and escalation. But to say Steele was “absolutely right,” as Paul has is a dangerous subversion of a very clear and universally accepted sequence of events; the Afghanistan war started before the Obama presidency.

Even then, Steele’s point, which was apparently to criticize Obama for not paying enough attention to the Iraq War effort, will have difficulty finding supporters, even among Republicans.

The President’s war policy is more or less untouchable from a Conservative standpoint, at least for a Democratic president. He has committed more troops, given a vague enough withdrawal date that can be easily pushed back, and has been remarkably careful in his interactions with the Military. A campaign against the Democrats based on the Wars would have a hard time convincing the nation that the President is doing too little. Most of his party base likely hold the opinion that he is doing too much.

Steele’s comments will likely help to fuel an already yawning divide between the Republican Party establishment and it’s increasingly agitated and pseudo-Libertarian supporters. The Tea Party movement, based most discernibly on nationalist patriotism than any one platform, will not tolerate such a perceived lack of support for our Armed Forces. It is no accident that Senators with the most to make up for with the Tea Party movement like McCain and Graham (both leaders of bipartisan immigration discussions unpopular with the Tea Party) are the first and loudest to denounce Steele.

Series NavigationAZ proposal would deny citizenship to US-born children of undocumented immigrants

Uri Lerner

Uri Lerner is a recent graduate of UC San Diego with a bachelor's in political science. He has worked with several diverse organizations including the Jewish Federation, an advocacy group; Town Hall Los Angeles, a public discourse forum; and El Centro de Accion Social, an education-based Pasadena community organization. Uri intends to unravel the logic behind political actions and policies and shed light onto rational motives.

Enlaces patrocinados

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Bitacoras.com

Los comentarios están cerrados.